NEW DELHI, July 21 — India’s education system, enshrined as a fundamental right for children aged 6 to 14 under the 2009 Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act, is managed by a three-tier government structure — central, state, and local — a design that was meant to ensure access. Yet for the roughly 10 out of every 13 children who sit in a government classroom, the experience is often marked by missing basics and rote drills, not critical thinking. The story begins with a constitutional shift.
In 1976, the 42nd Amendment moved education from the state list to the concurrent list, allowing the federal government to set policy while states retained autonomy. That trade-off produced vast interstate differences: a child’s quality of schooling can depend on which state they are born into.
Today, the ratio of public to private schools stands at approximately 10 to 3. In 2005–06, 83.13% of elementary schools (Grades 1–8) were government-managed, while 16.86% were private; of those private schools, one-third were “aided” and two-thirds “unaided.”
Degrees Without Skills
At its heart, the system faces a crisis of quality and employability. Half of all graduates are considered unemployable. Rote learning is the dominant pedagogy, and external assessments fuel a massive private coaching sector.
Students from underprivileged backgrounds — especially in rural areas — confront a shortage of quality schools and a dearth of proficient English teachers, which puts them at a further disadvantage. English is a major medium of instruction in higher education and professional fields, driven by India’s linguistic diversity — 22 recognized languages — and global integration.
But the lack of access to good English-language instruction compounds inequality. For those involved at every level — from village primary-school children to engineering graduates — the experience is shaped by a tangle of challenges: lack of access, poor quality, low learning outcomes, high dropout rates, and poor employability. Grade inflation, corruption, and unaccredited institutions further erode confidence in the credential system.
National policies such as the National Education Policy 2020, the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, and the Midday Meal Scheme aim to address parts of the problem, but implementation varies sharply by state.
International Attention
International stakeholders — among them UNICEF, UNESCO, and the World Bank — contribute to development efforts. Their involvement underscores the scale of the challenge: a system that educates hundreds of millions but still struggles to deliver the basic promise of the 2009 Act, which was that every child should have a chance at a quality education. What unfolds next matters.
The National Education Policy 2020 is still being rolled out; its success hinges on whether states can move beyond rote learning and improve teacher quality, especially in English and other core subjects. Without that, the gap between the half of graduates who are employable and the half who are not may only widen.
Sources
{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “NewsArticle”, “headline”: “India’s Exam Culture Fuels a Billion-Dollar Coaching Industry While”, “description”: “NEW DELHI, July 21 — India’s education system, enshrined as a fundamental right for children aged 6 to 14 under the 2009 Right to Free…”, “datePublished”: “2026-07-21T09:30:00+00:00”, “author”: {“@type”: “Person”, “name”: “Sophie King”}, “publisher”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “InfoPulse Today”, “url”: “https://newsfeed.infopulsetoday.com/”}, “citation”: [{“@type”: “CreativeWork”, “url”: “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_India”}]}
